Post Image

Permitting Reform Should Be A Non-Partisan Issue

July 23, 2026

Need to know

RealClear

Common Sense

LESS RED TAPE: Aggressive permitting reform should be one of the few issues Republicans and Democrats can agree on.
Since its founding in 2019, The Empowerment Alliance has championed cutting red tape that delays critical energy and infrastructure projects. Reducing bureaucracy is a vital component of our Common Sense Energy Agenda.
Why it matters:  Permitting reform will strengthen the economy, lower costs and get bureaucratic roadblocks out of the way. Energy guru Alex Epstein thinks voters should demand that every member of Congress support bipartisan permitting reform that addresses at least these four priorities:
  • Reform the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). A law intended to review projects has become an expensive, time-consuming tool to delay or block pipelines, power plants and other critical infrastructure.
  • Restore the Clean Water Act to its original purpose. The law was designed to protect waterways from pollution — not to stop interstate natural gas pipelines and electric transmission lines that don’t discharge pollutants into waterways.
  • Provide permitting certainty. A permit should mean a project is legal and can move forward. Instead, projects are routinely canceled or delayed by new administrations, creating uncertainty that discourages investment.
  • Modernize transmission policy. Allow FERC to approve transmission lines over state objections only when those projects clearly save consumers more than they cost.
Consider: Congress should also pass the Affordable, Reliable, Clean Energy Security Act, introduced by Rep. Troy Balderson (R-Ohio). This legislation establishes clear, common-sense definitions of affordable, reliable and clean energy, replacing political ambiguity with objective standards.
Instead of the government picking winners and losers, the bill creates a level playing field where energy sources compete on what matters most to Americans: affordability, reliability and environmental stewardship.
America doesn’t have an energy problem; rather, it has an antiquated permitting problem.
Bottom line: America cannot build its future with yesterday’s permitting system. It also can’t function without a federal measure that provides affordable and reliable energy sources that withstand electoral tides.

Nonsense

A NEW CAUSE: Green groups are entering the data center fight to regain political relevance.
Why it matters: Opposition to massive AI developments offers environmental groups a new cause — and a fresh fundraising pitch.
The Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council, Earthjustice and Food & Water Watch are ramping up national campaigns, mobilizing volunteers and supporting local efforts to block data centers.
Consider: 
  • With climate alarmism fading from the headlines, green-at-any-cost groups need a new villain — and a new revenue stream — to sustain their multi billion-dollar industry.
  • They have found one in data centers.
  • Never mind the benefits of AI: staying ahead of China, the numerous services that data centers support or the jobs and economic investment these projects bring.

Extremist environmental groups recently scored a major victory when New York Gov. Kathy Hochul froze most new large-scale data center construction while the state develops new standards.
Across the US power demand is soaring, and natural gas is expected to supply much of it. Utilities are also reconsidering plans to retire coal plants, another reason environmental activists are joining the fight.
The strategy is familiar: mobilize local opposition, target developers and block infrastructure by raising unfounded (in many cases) fears about air and water.
Bottom line: Wealthy climate groups are using data centers as their latest lifeline — repackaging their anti-development agenda and hatred of hydrocarbons to remain relevant. And keep their coffers full.

Midterm spotlight

A look ahead

  • Nothing on the calendar next week.

Quote of the week

“Artificial intelligence is central to the future of the defense industry and the future of militaries. If China leads in AI, they’ll be the dominant power in the 21st century. Nobody wants that, and we cannot let that happen.”