Renewables ‘can’t keep up’ with data center pace. As usual, the left wants government to step in.
July 20, 2026
By Gary Abernathy
The political left is worried that the rapid expansion of data centers across the U.S. – a controversial but necessary development considering our competition with China – is increasingly accompanied by the corresponding construction of stand-alone natural gas plants to provide the power demands of the centers.
In Ohio, 10 gas-fired power plants are in the works to fuel new data centers. In West Virginia, a
startup business building AI compute campuses plans to utilize hundreds of gas generators by 2028.
Newly minted trillionaire Elon Musk has purchased a gas turbine company specifically to power the
Tennessee-based data centers fueling Grok.
Across the nation, similar stories are playing out region by region, with dedicated gas plants often backed by tech giants who once swore off fossil fuels before reality set in.
Natural gas plants can be stood up relatively quickly and deliver the massive power required to keep the U.S. ahead of its adversaries in the AI/data center race. While data centers have resulted in
controversies in some local communities – an unsurprising NIMBY reaction – other places have
welcomed the developments.
As stated here before, artificial intelligence is here, like it or not. The only question is who will make the rules, the U.S. or China?
Soldiers in the anti-fossil fuel brigade are once again coming face-to-face with their biggest enemy: reality. And as usual, rather than seeking to engage fairly in the free market, backers of renewables are demanding that government write regulations requiring their use.
The Associated Press recently reported that “tech giants are demanding power at such speed and scale — some data centers consume more energy than a mid-size city — that the construction of wind and solar simply can’t keep up,” giving natural gas a substantial advantage. Most people call that the free market playing out as it naturally will. The climate change fearmongers call it foul play.
To level the field, the same old playbook is once again being deployed. For instance, in Michigan,
Oregon and Minnesota, laws have been enacted in the last 18 months “designed to protect their pre-
existing requirements that electric utilities use only emissions-free energy sources by 2040,” AP
reported, adding that similar bills are emerging in California, Illinois, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and
Virginia.
New York, not surprisingly, leads the way when it comes to the heavy hand of government
mandates. There, legislation would force data centers over a certain size “to meet renewable energy
benchmarks starting in 2030 and, by 2040, get at least 90% of their energy from renewable energies.”
The arrogance of those demanding that alternatives be given special consideration was once
more on display courtesy of a New York state lawmaker who wrote the bill in question.
“We are literally talking about the wealthiest companies in the world that are looking to build in
New York state,” said state Sen. Kristen Gonzalez (D), adding, “and if they have the resources to put billions of dollars into data center development, then they certainly should have the resources to build out renewable energy sources to power them.”
So there!
Insisting what other people can and should do with their money – and writing legislation forcing
them to do it – is a familiar page from the playbook of the left. Such attitudes will only be magnified by the new crop of socialists who are winning Democratic Party primaries across the country.
Of course, to back up the demand that renewables be governmentally propped up to power data centers, the left will trot out friendly new studies to bolster its arguments. So, right on cue, here
comes the Environmental Integrity Project with another study condemning the big, bad gas plants.
“Dozens of planned gas plants to directly power data centers in the United States could emit as much greenhouse gas annually as Australia or France,” according to a Reuters story on the findings of the study.
“An industry of the future should not be chained to dirty fuels of the past and the air pollution
from fossil fuels that cause real harm to communities,” said Jen Duggan, executive director of the EIP.
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin countered, “I think that a lot of Americans would agree that we should win this race against China to be the AI capital of the world.” Amen.
The climate change movement flourished under the Obama and Biden administrations, costing
taxpayers billions of dollars and funneling industries and consumers into a no-choice scenario of less reliable, less effective alternative power options. Thankfully, the Trump administration has unleashed all American energy resources – including inviting alternatives to compete in the free marketplace.
For now, the left acknowledges that the federal government is not friendly turf. So, when it comes to emerging data centers, the subsidies-and-mandates game is playing out at the state level,
because without such help, as AP reported, “the construction of wind and solar simply can’t keep up.”
In the free marketplace, things that can’t keep up eventually fall by the wayside. But in the fantasyland of far-left (and socialist) idealism, government regulations keep them afloat or even put
them in preferred positions – at least until their deficiencies become too obvious and too dangerous to pretend anymore. (For example, see the massive 2025 power outage in Spain, Portugal and parts of France, where alternatives failed and natural gas came to the rescue to restore power.)
The U.S. will likely win the AI race, but only because it got under way in earnest during the Trump
administration. If it had happened under the Biden regime, our government would be mandating
artificial benchmarks for renewables while China focused on controlling artificial intelligence for the world.
Gary Abernathy is a longtime newspaper editor, reporter and columnist. He was a contributing
columnist for the Washington Post from 2017-2023 and a frequent guest analyst across numerous media platforms. He is a contributing opinion columnist for The Empowerment Alliance, which advocates for realistic approaches to energy consumption and environmental conservation.